Pattalis v R [2013] NSWCCA 171

Pattalis v R [2013] NSWCCA 171

The applicant did not demonstrate that the sentence imposed was unreasonable or plainly unjust; the sentencing judge properly took into account relevant factors including the seriousness of the injuries, deterrence, and the applicant's subjective case, and imposed a sentence within the appropriate range.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
24 July 2013
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Sentence
Outcome
Leave to appeal refused.
Legal Topics
['sentence Appeal' 'assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm' 'manifestly Excessive Sentence' 'general Deterrence' 'specific Deterrence']
['criminal Law'] ['sentence Appeal' 'assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm' 'manifestly Excessive Sentence' 'general Deterrence' 'specific Deterrence']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Sentence Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive']

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant did not demonstrate that the sentence imposed was unreasonable or plainly unjust; the sentencing judge properly took into account relevant factors including the seriousness of the injuries, deterrence, and the applicant's subjective case, and imposed a sentence within the appropriate range.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal refused.

Orders

  • ['Leave to appeal refused.']