REGINA v NASTOSKI [2002] NSWCCA 528

REGINA v NASTOSKI [2002] NSWCCA 528

When the confidential material related to the co-offender is taken into account, no legitimate sense of grievance arises, and the sentences are appropriately measured in relation to each other; therefore, there is no unjustified disparity in sentencing.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
20 December 2002
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Sentence
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['sentencing' 'disparity in Sentencing' 'supply of Drugs']
['criminal Law'] ['sentencing' 'disparity in Sentencing' 'supply of Drugs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether there was an unjustified disparity in sentencing between the applicant and his co-offender']

Ratio Decidendi

When the confidential material related to the co-offender is taken into account, no legitimate sense of grievance arises, and the sentences are appropriately measured in relation to each other; therefore, there is no unjustified disparity in sentencing.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['Appeal dismissed']