ALEX PETER CHARANEKA v JAMES GALLAGHER [1993] NSWCA 56

ALEX PETER CHARANEKA v JAMES GALLAGHER [1993] NSWCA 56

The appellant sought contribution under an equitable doctrine, but the claim failed because he induced the respondent to sign the guarantee by misrepresentation, thereby approaching the court with unclean hands.

Parties
Appellant: Alex Peter Charaneka; Respondent: James Gallagher
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
17 August 1993
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Guarantee, Contribution, Misrepresentation, Unclean Hands, Costs
Equity Contract Guarantee Contribution Misrepresentation Unclean Hands Costs

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alex Peter Charaneka

Appellant

James Gallagher

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant can recover contribution from the respondent under a deed of guarantee executed following misrepresentation
  2. 2 Whether equitable relief is defeated by the appellant’s unclean hands
  3. 3 Responsibility for costs of an interlocutory application to strike out appeal for want of prosecution

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant sought contribution under an equitable doctrine, but the claim failed because he induced the respondent to sign the guarantee by misrepresentation, thereby approaching the court with unclean hands.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs
  • No order as to costs of interlocutory strike out application (per Sheller JA dissenting only as to costs)