SafeWork NSW v Grant [2017] NSWDC 99
The offence was of considerable seriousness because the risk of death or serious injury to workers from climbing or working near the dead tree was obvious and in fact foreseen, the consequences were plainly serious, and readily available measures such as a crane, elevated working platforms, structural integrity testing, exclusion zones and safe escape routes could have eliminated or reduced the risk. Taking into account aggravating factors, general and specific deterrence, the guilty plea, cooperation, no prior conviction and limited evidence of hardship, an $80,000 fine was appropriate.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 May 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Work Health and Safety Category 2 Offence Sentencing / Sentence After Guilty Plea
- Outcome
- The defendant was convicted and fined $80,000 with a moiety to the prosecutor, and ordered to pay the prosecutor's costs as agreed or assessed.
- Legal Topics
- ['category 2 Offence' 'guilty Plea' 'tree Felling' 'foreseeability of Risk' 'general Deterrence' 'specific Deterrence' 'mitigating Factors' 'aggravating Factors']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Work Health and Safety Category 2 Offence Sentencing / Sentence After Guilty Plea
Legal Issues
- 1 ["What sentence should be imposed for the defendant's breach of s 32 of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 after a guilty plea." 'The seriousness of the offence having regard to the foreseeability of the risk of death or serious injury and the measures available to avoid the risk.' 'The relevance of aggravating factors, deterrence, the guilty plea, cooperation, absence of prior convictions and claimed remorse.']
Ratio Decidendi
The offence was of considerable seriousness because the risk of death or serious injury to workers from climbing or working near the dead tree was obvious and in fact foreseen, the consequences were plainly serious, and readily available measures such as a crane, elevated working platforms, structural integrity testing, exclusion zones and safe escape routes could have eliminated or reduced the risk. Taking into account aggravating factors, general and specific deterrence, the guilty plea, cooperation, no prior conviction and limited evidence of hardship, an $80,000 fine was appropriate.
Court Disposition
The defendant was convicted and fined $80,000 with a moiety to the prosecutor, and ordered to pay the prosecutor's costs as agreed or assessed.
Orders
- ['The defendant is convicted and fined the sum of $80,000 with a moiety to the prosecutor.' "The defendant is to pay the prosecutor's costs as agreed or assessed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment