Tahmindjis, A.J. & Ors v. Brown, B.R. & Ors [1985] FCA 214
The private and confidential communication of the Magistrate’s views to the solicitor for the prosecution, without informing the defence and while maintaining a ‘tentative’ stance in public, constituted a denial of natural justice and gave rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. The committal orders were thus invalid.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 May 1985
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- orders for committal set aside
- Legal Topics
- ['natural Justice' 'bias' 'committal Proceedings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether committal orders made against applicants were invalid due to private communications between Magistrate and prosecution solicitor' 'Whether such communications amounted to bias' 'Whether there was a denial of natural justice']
Ratio Decidendi
The private and confidential communication of the Magistrate’s views to the solicitor for the prosecution, without informing the defence and while maintaining a ‘tentative’ stance in public, constituted a denial of natural justice and gave rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. The committal orders were thus invalid.
Court Disposition
orders for committal set aside
Orders
- ['The orders for committal are set aside; further argument will be heard on the form of orders and costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment