Alexander Stuart Lidden v James Leslie Comino [2007] NSWIRComm 136

Alexander Stuart Lidden v James Leslie Comino [2007] NSWIRComm 136

The contract or arrangement became unfair during its course due to the conduct of the respondent who, after representing a minimum engagement of six months and causing the applicant to incur establishment costs, sought to alter the arrangement and terminate the applicant when he declined to enter a new contract for daily hire. The Court found the representations amounted to a contract for six months, declared the contract void ab initio (except for payments made), and awarded compensation based on net earnings, partial establishment costs, and legal expenses.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
01 June 2007
Procedural Posture
Application Under S 106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 / Judgment
Outcome
Contract declared void ab initio (except for payments made); monetary orders granted in favour of applicant
Legal Topics
['unfair Contract' 'termination of Contract' 'restitution' 'mitigation' 'engagement Period' 'sub Contracting' 'industrial Relations Act 1996 S 106']
['employment Law' 'industrial Relations'] ['unfair Contract' 'termination of Contract' 'restitution' 'mitigation' 'engagement Period' 'sub Contracting' 'industrial Relations Act 1996 S 106']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application Under S 106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether a verbal contract existed for a six-month engagement' 'Whether the contract or arrangement became unfair by conduct of the respondent' 'Entitlement to restitution and costs' 'Application of mitigation principles']

Ratio Decidendi

The contract or arrangement became unfair during its course due to the conduct of the respondent who, after representing a minimum engagement of six months and causing the applicant to incur establishment costs, sought to alter the arrangement and terminate the applicant when he declined to enter a new contract for daily hire. The Court found the representations amounted to a contract for six months, declared the contract void ab initio (except for payments made), and awarded compensation based on net earnings, partial establishment costs, and legal expenses.

Court Disposition

Contract declared void ab initio (except for payments made); monetary orders granted in favour of applicant

Orders

  • ['The contract and/or arrangement between the applicant and the respondent is declared to have become unfair during its course because of the conduct of the respondent.' 'The contract and/or arrangement between the applicant and the respondent is declared void ab initio, except in relation to payments made by the...