R v Thoral [2022] NSWDC 73
The sentence imposed by the Magistrate was set aside because the indicative sentences selected and the aggregate approach were not appropriate. The court imposed new indicative sentences with a proper discount for the plea of guilty, resulting in a total aggregate sentence of seven months with a five-month non-parole period commencing from the date of arrest.
- Parties
- Crown: R; Appellant: Alexander Thoral
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 February 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Sentencing Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; sentence set aside; new sentence imposed.
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Against Sentence, Larceny, Obtaining Financial Advantage by Deception, Sentencing Principles
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R
Crown
Alexander Thoral
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Sentencing Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed by the Magistrate was manifestly excessive
- 2 Determination of appropriate sentence for larceny and obtaining financial advantage by deception
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence imposed by the Magistrate was set aside because the indicative sentences selected and the aggregate approach were not appropriate. The court imposed new indicative sentences with a proper discount for the plea of guilty, resulting in a total aggregate sentence of seven months with a five-month non-parole period commencing from the date of arrest.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; sentence set aside; new sentence imposed.
Orders
- Sentence imposed by Central Local Court on 9 November 2021 set aside.
- Non-parole period of five months commencing 4 October 2021, expiring 3 March 2022.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment