Alexander ZAPHIR v R [2009] NSWCCA 124

Alexander ZAPHIR v R [2009] NSWCCA 124

It was open to the jury, on the evidence given, particularly that of Mr Ng and Ms Isbell, to be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant was guilty of the offence alleged, and the appeal against conviction should be dismissed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 April 2009
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
Appeal against conviction dismissed
Legal Topics
['assault With Intent to Rob in Company' 'unreasonable Verdict']
['criminal Law'] ['assault With Intent to Rob in Company' 'unreasonable Verdict']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the conviction for assault with intent to rob in company was unreasonable and cannot be sustained having regard to the evidence']

Ratio Decidendi

It was open to the jury, on the evidence given, particularly that of Mr Ng and Ms Isbell, to be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant was guilty of the offence alleged, and the appeal against conviction should be dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal against conviction dismissed

Orders

  • ['Appeal dismissed']