Rogers v Northern NSW Local Health District [2017] NSWSC 731
There was no evidence of a risk that Mr Kirbach would dissipate assets or remove property from the jurisdiction so as to frustrate execution of any judgment, thus the requirements for a freezing order were not met and the application was refused.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 June 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury / Interlocutory Application for Ex Parte Freezing Order
- Outcome
- Application for ex parte freezing order refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['injunctions' 'freezing Orders' 'personal Injury' 'cross Claims']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury / Interlocutory Application for Ex Parte Freezing Order
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a freezing order should be granted ex parte against a third party in the absence of evidence of risk of dissipation of assets or frustration of judgment.']
Ratio Decidendi
There was no evidence of a risk that Mr Kirbach would dissipate assets or remove property from the jurisdiction so as to frustrate execution of any judgment, thus the requirements for a freezing order were not met and the application was refused.
Court Disposition
Application for ex parte freezing order refused.
Orders
- ['Application for freezing order dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment