Clonda v NSW Squash Limited; Clonda v Squash Australia Limited [2020] NSWCATAD 246
There are real questions of fact as to whether the applicant was subject to detriment for reasons including her protected activities under the Anti-Discrimination Act; these matters are appropriately determined at a hearing and do not warrant summary dismissal under s102.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 October 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Proceeding / Interlocutory Application for Summary Dismissal
- Outcome
- Application for summary dismissal refused; proceedings to continue.
- Legal Topics
- ['victimisation' 'summary Dismissal' 'procedural Rulings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Proceeding / Interlocutory Application for Summary Dismissal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether claims of victimisation under section 50 of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 should be summarily dismissed pursuant to section 102 of the Act.']
Ratio Decidendi
There are real questions of fact as to whether the applicant was subject to detriment for reasons including her protected activities under the Anti-Discrimination Act; these matters are appropriately determined at a hearing and do not warrant summary dismissal under s102.
Court Disposition
Application for summary dismissal refused; proceedings to continue.
Orders
- ['The application to dismiss these proceedings under section 102 of the Anti-Discrimination Act is dismissed.' "Ms Clonda's application is to be listed by the Registrar of the Tribunal for Directions."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment