In the matter of Qatar No.2 Pty Ltd ACN 001184407 and Qatar No.3 Pty Ltd ACN 001184416 [2015] NSWSC 2088

In the matter of Qatar No.2 Pty Ltd ACN 001184407 and Qatar No.3 Pty Ltd ACN 001184416 [2015] NSWSC 2088

There was no seriously arguable case for final relief as the applicant could not demonstrate any enforceable option or agreement capable of supporting relief against forfeiture, nor any procedural irregularity causing injustice; thus, the interlocutory undertaking should be released and the notice of motion dismissed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
27 July 2015
Procedural Posture
Equity Corporations List / Interlocutory/procedural Ruling on Notice of Motion and Undertaking
Outcome
Plaintiff's notice of motion dismissed; defendants released from undertaking; costs awarded to defendants.
Legal Topics
['interim Injunctions' 'relief Against Forfeiture' 'shareholder Resolutions' 'company Liquidation']
['equity' 'corporations Law'] ['interim Injunctions' 'relief Against Forfeiture' 'shareholder Resolutions' 'company Liquidation']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Equity Corporations List / Interlocutory/procedural Ruling on Notice of Motion and Undertaking

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether an interim injunction should be upheld to prevent sale of property as part of liquidation' 'Whether a shareholder resolution required a 75% majority or was otherwise valid' 'Whether relief against forfeiture is available for an option to acquire company property' 'Whether an enforceable agreement or option existed and if it was exercised']

Ratio Decidendi

There was no seriously arguable case for final relief as the applicant could not demonstrate any enforceable option or agreement capable of supporting relief against forfeiture, nor any procedural irregularity causing injustice; thus, the interlocutory undertaking should be released and the notice of motion dismissed.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's notice of motion dismissed; defendants released from undertaking; costs awarded to defendants.

Orders

  • ["The plaintiff's notice of motion filed 27 July 2015 be dismissed." "On the defendants' motion filed 24 July 2015, the defendants be released from the undertaking contained in the amended undertaking given in the proceedings and referred to in the orders of 7 July 2015." "The plaintiff pay the defendants' costs of...