Ducker v Martin [2008] NSWLEC 1265
None of the trees meet the jurisdictional tests in s 10(2)(a) or (b) of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006; there is insufficient evidence of tree roots or leaves causing or likely to cause property damage or injury to persons, and alternative explanations for minor property damage exist. Accordingly, the application must be dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 June 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Final Hearing and Determination
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['tree Disputes Between Neighbours' 'removal of Trees' 'property Damage' 'possible Personal Injury' 'court Jurisdiction Under the Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Final Hearing and Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether roots of the trees have caused, are causing, or are likely to cause damage to the applicant's property" "Whether leaves of the trees have caused, are causing, or are likely to cause damage to the applicant's property" 'Whether any of the trees are likely to cause injury to any person']
Ratio Decidendi
None of the trees meet the jurisdictional tests in s 10(2)(a) or (b) of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006; there is insufficient evidence of tree roots or leaves causing or likely to cause property damage or injury to persons, and alternative explanations for minor property damage exist. Accordingly, the application must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['The application is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment