Crouch v Ozanne [1910] HCA 49
No bribery or irregularities likely to affect the result of the election were established on the evidence; the exclusion of scrutineers and alleged improper acts did not impact the outcome given the majority in question.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Richard Armstrong Crouch; Respondent: Alfred Thomas Ozanne
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 September 1910
- Procedural Posture
- Election Petition / Judgment
- Outcome
- Petition dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Parliamentary Election, Candidate Liability for Acts of Agent, Scrutineers’ Rights, Irregularities in Polling, Bribery Allegations, Commonwealth Electoral Act 1902 1909
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Richard Armstrong Crouch
Petitioner
Alfred Thomas Ozanne
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Election Petition / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether alleged bribery by the candidate was established and sufficient to void the election
- 2 Whether irregularities or illegal practices by presiding officers or agents were proved and likely to have affected the result of the election
- 3 Whether improper exclusion of scrutineers was sufficient to affect the election outcome
Ratio Decidendi
No bribery or irregularities likely to affect the result of the election were established on the evidence; the exclusion of scrutineers and alleged improper acts did not impact the outcome given the majority in question.
Court Disposition
Petition dismissed with costs
Orders
- Petition dismissed with costs; petitioner to pay the respondent’s costs to the extent of £100, the £50 deposit to be applied toward payment of costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment