Crouch v Ozanne [1910] HCA 49

Crouch v Ozanne [1910] HCA 49

No bribery or irregularities likely to affect the result of the election were established on the evidence; the exclusion of scrutineers and alleged improper acts did not impact the outcome given the majority in question.

Parties
Petitioner: Richard Armstrong Crouch; Respondent: Alfred Thomas Ozanne
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
17 September 1910
Procedural Posture
Election Petition / Judgment
Outcome
Petition dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Parliamentary Election, Candidate Liability for Acts of Agent, Scrutineers’ Rights, Irregularities in Polling, Bribery Allegations, Commonwealth Electoral Act 1902 1909

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Richard Armstrong Crouch

Petitioner

Alfred Thomas Ozanne

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Election Petition / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether alleged bribery by the candidate was established and sufficient to void the election
  2. 2 Whether irregularities or illegal practices by presiding officers or agents were proved and likely to have affected the result of the election
  3. 3 Whether improper exclusion of scrutineers was sufficient to affect the election outcome

Ratio Decidendi

No bribery or irregularities likely to affect the result of the election were established on the evidence; the exclusion of scrutineers and alleged improper acts did not impact the outcome given the majority in question.

Court Disposition

Petition dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Petition dismissed with costs; petitioner to pay the respondent’s costs to the extent of £100, the £50 deposit to be applied toward payment of costs.