Jafari v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 373
The application specified no grounds, the applicant's submissions merely challenged factual findings and disclosed no ground within section 476(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth), and the Court perceived no error or reviewable ground in the Tribunal's reasons; accordingly the application was dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 March 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Review of a Decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal Refusing Grant of a Protection Visa / Federal Court Reasons and Orders on Application for Review
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; applicant ordered to pay the respondent's costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'judicial Review' 'migration Act 1958 (cth) S 476' 'no Evidence Ground']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Review of a Decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal Refusing Grant of a Protection Visa / Federal Court Reasons and Orders on Application for Review
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the application or the applicant's submissions disclosed any ground of review within section 476(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)." "Whether the Tribunal's reasons disclosed any error or ground under section 476(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)."]
Ratio Decidendi
The application specified no grounds, the applicant's submissions merely challenged factual findings and disclosed no ground within section 476(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth), and the Court perceived no error or reviewable ground in the Tribunal's reasons; accordingly the application was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; applicant ordered to pay the respondent's costs.
Orders
- ['The application be dismissed.' "The applicant pay the respondent's costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment