Regina v Khalouf [2005] NSWCCA 395

Regina v Khalouf [2005] NSWCCA 395

The directions given by the trial judge were adequate, having taken into account the requirements under s 23 of the Crimes Act 1900, the need to evaluate the response of an ordinary person to the alleged provocation, and the appropriate onus and standard of proof. No substantial miscarriage of justice occurred from the absence of further directions regarding consciousness of guilt or the precise wording on provocation.

Parties
Appellant: Ali Khalouf; Respondent: The Crown
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
18 November 2005
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Appeal Against Conviction, Murder, Provocation, Jury Directions, Consciousness of Guilt
Criminal Law Appeal Against Conviction Murder Provocation Jury Directions Consciousness of Guilt

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ali Khalouf

Appellant

The Crown

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the jury were misdirected as to provocation under s 23(2)(b) and s 23(3)(a) of the Crimes Act 1900
  2. 2 Whether there was a failure to direct the jury as to consciousness of guilt
  3. 3 Whether the trial judge properly directed the jury on the use of the appellant's accounts and inconsistencies

Ratio Decidendi

The directions given by the trial judge were adequate, having taken into account the requirements under s 23 of the Crimes Act 1900, the need to evaluate the response of an ordinary person to the alleged provocation, and the appropriate onus and standard of proof. No substantial miscarriage of justice occurred from the absence of further directions regarding consciousness of guilt or the precise wording on provocation.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.