Chan v Four C Realty Pty Ltd (in liq), in the matter of Four C Realty Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 2) [2013] FCA 959
Approval was granted under s 477(2B) because the contract was entered into in good faith, reflected the considered commercial judgment of the liquidators at the time, there was insufficient certainty or detail in the competing offer, and further delay would not be in the interests of creditors and members. Certainty and the expeditious administration of the liquidation were preferred over speculative potential improvement, and there were no substantial grounds to doubt the prudence of the liquidators' conduct.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 September 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations – Application for Retrospective Approval of Sale of Business in Liquidation / Judgment After Application for Approval Under S 477(2 B) Corporations Act 2001 (cth)
- Outcome
- Approval granted for the liquidators’ entry into the contract with Ms Chan under s 477(2B) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), nunc pro tunc.
- Legal Topics
- ['liquidator Powers' 'long Term Agreements' 'sale of Business' 'court Approval of Transactions by Liquidator']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Corporations – Application for Retrospective Approval of Sale of Business in Liquidation / Judgment After Application for Approval Under S 477(2 B) Corporations Act 2001 (cth)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court should grant retrospective approval under s 477(2B) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) for the liquidators to enter into the contract for sale of business assets to Ms Chan' 'Whether the sales process conducted by the liquidators was fair and in the best interests of creditors and members' 'Whether another competing offer should prevent approval of the existing contract']
Ratio Decidendi
Approval was granted under s 477(2B) because the contract was entered into in good faith, reflected the considered commercial judgment of the liquidators at the time, there was insufficient certainty or detail in the competing offer, and further delay would not be in the interests of creditors and members. Certainty and the expeditious administration of the liquidation were preferred over speculative potential improvement, and there were no substantial grounds to doubt the prudence of the liquidators' conduct.
Court Disposition
Approval granted for the liquidators’ entry into the contract with Ms Chan under s 477(2B) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), nunc pro tunc.
Orders
- ['The applicant given leave nunc pro tunc to proceed against the first respondent per s 471B.' 'Joinder of liquidators as second and third respondents and Wenlyan Pty Ltd as fourth respondent, amending title accordingly.' 'Extension granted under s 1322(4)(d) for application for approval under s 477(2B).' 'Approval...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment