Lim & 1ors v Timwin 2001C Pty Ltd & 1 ors [2007] NSWSC 185
The plaintiff was not entitled to commission because the sale was not successfully settled due to the purchaser’s death and subsequent rescission of the contract. The commission was contingent upon successful settlement, which did not occur. There was no breach of implied terms by voluntary act of the defendant. The Magistrate’s decision on costs did not involve consideration of irrelevant matters.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 March 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['commission Claims' 'underwriting Agreement' 'implied Terms' 'variation and Rescission of Contracts' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the plaintiff was entitled to commission under the underwriting agreement despite the sale not being settled due to the purchaser’s death' 'Whether the Local Court erred in finding the contract extinguished and denying commission' 'Whether the Magistrate erred in considering the Property Stock and Business Agents Act 2002 when awarding costs']
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff was not entitled to commission because the sale was not successfully settled due to the purchaser’s death and subsequent rescission of the contract. The commission was contingent upon successful settlement, which did not occur. There was no breach of implied terms by voluntary act of the defendant. The Magistrate’s decision on costs did not involve consideration of irrelevant matters.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['The appeal fails.' 'The Summons is dismissed.' 'The plaintiff is to pay the costs of the proceedings.' 'Exhibits may be returned.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment