Aliyah Putri Pty Ltd v Randwick City Council [2018] NSWLEC 1307
An agreement having been reached by the parties consistent with s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, the appeal was upheld and the development application was approved subject to conditions, without merit assessment of the substantive planning issues.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 June 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld. Development application approved, subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'residential Flat Building' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between Parties' 'land and Environment Court Procedure']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether to approve Development Application DA-542/2017 for demolition of an existing dwelling and construction of a residential flat building comprising 13 units at 6 Forsyth Street, Kingsford']
Ratio Decidendi
An agreement having been reached by the parties consistent with s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, the appeal was upheld and the development application was approved subject to conditions, without merit assessment of the substantive planning issues.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld. Development application approved, subject to conditions.
Orders
- ['Leave granted to rely on amended plans listed in condition 1 of Annexure A.' "Applicant to pay the Council's costs pursuant to section 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 as agreed or assessed." 'The appeal is upheld.' 'Development Application No. (DA/542/2017) for demolition of the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment