Environment Protection Authority -V- Alkem Drums Pty Ltd [1999] NSWLEC 26
The offence created by reg 21(3) is not a continuing offence; upon expiration of the compliance date in the notice, the offence is complete. The charge as framed is defective for duplicity and fails to particularise which requirement of the notice is alleged to be breached; thus, does not disclose an offence known to law.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Environment Protection Authority; Defendant: Alkem Drums Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 April 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Interlocutory; Orders Made After Plea and Argument, Prior to Final Determination
- Outcome
- No final determination; further directions made. Defendant consented to pay prosecutor's costs.
- Legal Topics
- Environmental Offences, Continuing Offence, Duplicity, Compliance With Regulatory Notice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Environment Protection Authority
Prosecutor
Alkem Drums Pty Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Interlocutory; Orders Made After Plea and Argument, Prior to Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the failure to comply with a notice issued under Clean Waters Regulation 21 constitutes a continuing offence
- 2 Whether the charge as presently framed discloses an offence known to law
- 3 Whether the charge is bad for duplicity
Ratio Decidendi
The offence created by reg 21(3) is not a continuing offence; upon expiration of the compliance date in the notice, the offence is complete. The charge as framed is defective for duplicity and fails to particularise which requirement of the notice is alleged to be breached; thus, does not disclose an offence known to law.
Court Disposition
No final determination; further directions made. Defendant consented to pay prosecutor's costs.
Orders
- The prosecutor is directed to file and serve any Notice of Motion to amend and elect requirements by 4.00 pm on 7 May 1999, returnable on 14 May 1999.
- The proceedings are adjourned for mention at 9.30 am on 14 May 1999.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment