Barnes v Gibson [2018] NSWLEC 1151
Roots from the respondents' Swamp Oaks caused damage to the upper courtyard paving and are likely to cause further damage. Tree removal is justified under the Trees Act, but only partial compensation—30% of the cost for replacing the upper paved area— is warranted due to the age, condition, and the possibility of other contributing factors.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 March 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Class 2 Proceeding / Final Judgment and Orders
- Outcome
- Orders made for removal of trees and partial compensation
- Legal Topics
- ['tree Disputes Between Neighbours' 'damage Caused by Tree Roots' 'compensation for Rectification Costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 2 Proceeding / Final Judgment and Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the respondents' trees caused damage to the applicant's paving and structures" 'Whether removal of the trees is justified to prevent future damage' 'Extent of compensation to be paid for rectification works']
Ratio Decidendi
Roots from the respondents' Swamp Oaks caused damage to the upper courtyard paving and are likely to cause further damage. Tree removal is justified under the Trees Act, but only partial compensation—30% of the cost for replacing the upper paved area— is warranted due to the age, condition, and the possibility of other contributing factors.
Court Disposition
Orders made for removal of trees and partial compensation
Orders
- ['Respondents to engage and pay for an arborist to remove both Swamp Oaks within 60 days, to no more than 300 mm above ground level, and poison remaining stumps.' "Respondents to give the applicant 7 days' notice of the works." 'Applicant to allow access for completion of the works during reasonable hours.'...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment