Goldsworthy v Radio 2UE Sydney Pty Limited [1999] NSWSC 291
Objection to imputation (b) on form fails, but the broadcast as a whole is not capable of conveying the imputation that "decent lawyers would deplore the conduct of the plaintiff." Thus, imputation (b) is struck out. The context of the matter complained of is capable of conveying the imputation that the plaintiff is unfit to be a lawyer; imputation (c) is not struck out.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 March 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application—ruling on Strike Out of Imputations in Second Further Amended Statement of Claim
- Outcome
- Imputation (b) struck out; imputation (c) not struck out.
- Legal Topics
- ['imputations' 'electronic Media' 'striking Out Pleadings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application—ruling on Strike Out of Imputations in Second Further Amended Statement of Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether imputation (b) is capable of being conveyed by the broadcast' 'Whether imputation (c) is capable of being conveyed by the broadcast']
Ratio Decidendi
Objection to imputation (b) on form fails, but the broadcast as a whole is not capable of conveying the imputation that "decent lawyers would deplore the conduct of the plaintiff." Thus, imputation (b) is struck out. The context of the matter complained of is capable of conveying the imputation that the plaintiff is unfit to be a lawyer; imputation (c) is not struck out.
Court Disposition
Imputation (b) struck out; imputation (c) not struck out.
Orders
- ['Imputation (b) is struck out.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment