R v Quinn [2002] NSWCCA 508

R v Quinn [2002] NSWCCA 508

The overall effective non-parole period of five years was excessive compared to the six-year sentence. A four-year non-parole period was appropriate, and specific adjustment to Count 7 was required to implement this result in line with sentencing principles and special circumstances.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
19 December 2002
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal on Severity of Sentence; Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
['sentencing' 'severity of Sentence' 'totality' 'assistance to Authorities' 'non Parole Period']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal on Severity of Sentence; Appeal Judgment

  1. 1 ['Whether the overall effective non-parole period imposed was excessive relative to the sentence' 'Whether assistance to authorities in another state should be taken into account in sentencing' 'Application of totality and Pearce principles in combined sentencing for offences across states']

Ratio Decidendi

The overall effective non-parole period of five years was excessive compared to the six-year sentence. A four-year non-parole period was appropriate, and specific adjustment to Count 7 was required to implement this result in line with sentencing principles and special circumstances.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • ['Application for leave to appeal on severity of sentence granted' 'Appeal allowed' 'Set aside the sentence imposed for the offence under Count 7' 'Resentence the applicant for the offence under Count 7 as follows: The applicant is sentenced to imprisonment for a term of three years commencing on 1 July 2002 with a...