Allan Kosinar v Ku-ring-gai Council [2016] NSWLEC 1626
The Court, upon satisfaction that the agreement reached under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 was an appropriate exercise of its function, must dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the agreement and set out in writing the terms of the decision.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 December 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 / Post Conciliation Conference Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; application approved subject to conditions
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'tree Removal' 'replacement Planting']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 / Post Conciliation Conference Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 can dispose of the proceedings' 'Approval of application for removal of four trees and planting of six replacement trees']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court, upon satisfaction that the agreement reached under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 was an appropriate exercise of its function, must dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the agreement and set out in writing the terms of the decision.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; application approved subject to conditions
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'The Applicant is granted leave to rely upon the amended plan listed in condition 1 of Annexure "A".' 'Application No. DA0150/16 for the removal of four trees and planting of 6 replacement trees at 7A Derby Street St Ives is approved subject to the conditions annexed and marked "A".']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment