Kessing v R [2008] NSWCCA 310
Notwithstanding erroneous jury directions concerning confirmation of reports, the evidence overwhelmingly established guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and no substantial miscarriage of justice occurred; appeal dismissed under the proviso.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['commonwealth Officer Misconduct' 'unauthorised Disclosure of Official Information' 'hearsay Evidence' 'jury Directions' 'motive Evidence' 'application of Proviso']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the verdict was unreasonable or unsupported by evidence' 'Whether the trial judge erred in jury directions regarding communication to journalists' 'Admissibility of hearsay evidence (newspaper article)' 'Failure to give s 165 Evidence Act warning' 'Failure to give Jones v Dunkel direction' 'Admissibility of motive and email evidence' 'Application of the proviso under Criminal Appeal Act']
Ratio Decidendi
Notwithstanding erroneous jury directions concerning confirmation of reports, the evidence overwhelmingly established guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and no substantial miscarriage of justice occurred; appeal dismissed under the proviso.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Appeal against conviction dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment