Allan Smith v RTT & Anor [2002] NSWSC 518
No error of law or denial of procedural fairness was established; the Tribunal was entitled to refuse the order sought based on evidence regarding fire safety and the width between the door and the stairwell. Consideration of the Building Code was not irrelevant, and proper procedure was followed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 June 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Summons dismissed; plaintiff to pay second defendant's costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['procedural Fairness' 'natural Justice' 'error of Law' 'residential Tenancies' 'tribunal Appeals']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Residential Tribunal erred in law in refusing to order the replacement of a security door' 'Whether procedural fairness or natural justice was denied to the plaintiff' 'Whether the Tribunal considered irrelevant matters (building code standards)']
Ratio Decidendi
No error of law or denial of procedural fairness was established; the Tribunal was entitled to refuse the order sought based on evidence regarding fire safety and the width between the door and the stairwell. Consideration of the Building Code was not irrelevant, and proper procedure was followed.
Court Disposition
Summons dismissed; plaintiff to pay second defendant's costs.
Orders
- ['The summons is dismissed.' "The plaintiff is to pay the second defendant's costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment