Berryman v Joslyn (3) [2006] NSWCA 44
The omission of a specified date in Order 5 was accidental and falls within the scope of the slip rule, justifying correction to specify 'from 13 December 1999'.
- Parties
- Appellant: Allan Troy Berryman; First Respondent: Sally Inch Joslyn; Second Respondent: Wentworth Shire Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Correct Orders (slip Rule) / Post Judgment Motion
- Outcome
- Order 5 corrected to specify 'from 13 December 1999'.
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Parties
Allan Troy Berryman
Appellant
Sally Inch Joslyn
First Respondent
Wentworth Shire Council
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application to Correct Orders (slip Rule) / Post Judgment Motion
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Order 5 made on 16 July 2004 should be corrected under the slip rule to specify 'from 13 December 1999' rather than 'from the date of payment'.
Ratio Decidendi
The omission of a specified date in Order 5 was accidental and falls within the scope of the slip rule, justifying correction to specify 'from 13 December 1999'.
Court Disposition
Order 5 corrected to specify 'from 13 December 1999'.
Orders
- Order 5 made in proceedings No CA 40888/99 on 16 July 2004 be corrected by deleting therefrom the words 'from the date of payment' and by substituting in lieu thereof the words 'from 13 December 1999'.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment