Allcastle Homes Pty Ltd v Wilkinson [2016] NSWCATAP 3
The Tribunal did not err in categorising the claim for damages based on breach of a tender agreement as a building claim under s 48A of the Home Building Act; preparatory work supplied under the agreement had a sufficient causal nexus with contemplated residential building work.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 January 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal Panel Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['jurisdiction Under Home Building Act' "definition of 'building Claim'" 'preparatory Work and Residential Building Work']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal Panel Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether claim for damages under a tender agreement is a 'building claim' under the Home Building Act" "Whether preparatory and feasibility work falls within 'building goods or services' for jurisdictional purposes"]
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal did not err in categorising the claim for damages based on breach of a tender agreement as a building claim under s 48A of the Home Building Act; preparatory work supplied under the agreement had a sufficient causal nexus with contemplated residential building work.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Appeal dismissed' 'Proceedings remitted to Consumer and Commercial Division for hearing of application']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment