Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v Jenkins [2020] NSWSC 412
Entitlement to weekly statutory benefits for loss of earning capacity under s 3.8 of the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 (NSW) is to be calculated by reference to net (post-tax) pre-accident earnings, not gross earnings, as otherwise the claimant would receive a windfall exceeding their actual loss, contrary to the...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd; First Defendant: Karen Ann Jenkins; Second Defendant: State Insurance Regulatory Authority; Third Defendant: Terence Stern, Jeanette Woollacott and Katherine Ruschen, in their capacity as a Merit Review Panel appointed by SIRA
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 April 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Decision of the third defendant set aside and the matter remitted for determination according to law.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 (nsw), Entitlement to Net or Gross Weekly Earnings in Third Entitlement Period
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd
Plaintiff
Karen Ann Jenkins
First Defendant
State Insurance Regulatory Authority
Second Defendant
Terence Stern, Jeanette Woollacott and Katherine Ruschen, in their capacity as a Merit Review Panel appointed by SIRA
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether entitlement to statutory benefits under s 3.8 of the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 (NSW) is calculated by reference to net or gross weekly earnings in the third entitlement period
Ratio Decidendi
Entitlement to weekly statutory benefits for loss of earning capacity under s 3.8 of the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 (NSW) is to be calculated by reference to net (post-tax) pre-accident earnings, not gross earnings, as otherwise the claimant would receive a windfall exceeding their actual loss, contrary to the compensatory purpose of the Act.
Court Disposition
Decision of the third defendant set aside and the matter remitted for determination according to law.
Orders
- Set aside the decision of the third defendant made on 4 December 2019.
- To the extent necessary, set aside the decision which was the subject of review by the third defendant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment