Alpall v Blue Mountains City Council [No 2] [2005] NSWLEC 720

Alpall v Blue Mountains City Council [No 2] [2005] NSWLEC 720

Although the applicant failed to provide requested information on solar access before or during the hearing, the council could not specify any legal costs incurred as a result of that failure. The council's costs in defending the appeal were therefore the same as they would have been if the applicant had provided the information, so it was not fair and reasonable to award costs against the applicant.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
21 December 2005
Procedural Posture
Application for Costs Arising Out of a Development Appeal / Costs Application After Refusal of the Development Appeal
Outcome
The council's application for costs was dismissed.
Legal Topics
['development Application' 'seniors Living Development' 'merit Appeal Costs' 'solar Access Information']
['planning and Environment Law' 'costs'] ['development Application' 'seniors Living Development' 'merit Appeal Costs' 'solar Access Information']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Costs Arising Out of a Development Appeal / Costs Application After Refusal of the Development Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether it was fair and reasonable to order the applicant to pay the council's costs in merit proceedings." "Whether the council incurred costs as a result of the applicant's failure to provide information on solar access."]

Ratio Decidendi

Although the applicant failed to provide requested information on solar access before or during the hearing, the council could not specify any legal costs incurred as a result of that failure. The council's costs in defending the appeal were therefore the same as they would have been if the applicant had provided the information, so it was not fair and reasonable to award costs against the applicant.

Court Disposition

The council's application for costs was dismissed.

Orders

  • ["The council's application for costs is dismissed." 'The exhibits are returned.']