ALS16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1290
The appeal was dismissed because the appellant failed to demonstrate appealable error in the Federal Circuit Court's decision. The Tribunal's adverse credibility findings, including its rejection of the appellant's account of marriage to a Christian woman, conversion to Christianity and harm in Bangladesh, were reasonably open on the material. Those findings permitted the Tribunal to give no weight to the claimed corroborative evidence and meant the factual substratum of the protection and complementary protection claims fell away. The appellant identified no information enlivening s 424A, was afforded a meaningful opportunity under s 425, and the proposed new grounds lacked sufficient...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 August 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Migration Appeal From Federal Circuit Court Judicial Review Decision / Appeal to the Federal Court of Australia From ALS16 V Minister for Immigration and Anor [2018] FCCA 345
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs payable by the appellant to the first respondent.
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'jurisdictional Error' 'credibility Findings' 'sections 424 a and 425 of the Migration Act 1958 (cth)' 'new Grounds on Appeal' 'complementary Protection']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Migration Appeal From Federal Circuit Court Judicial Review Decision / Appeal to the Federal Court of Australia From ALS16 V Minister for Immigration and Anor [2018] FCCA 345
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Federal Circuit Court erred in finding no jurisdictional error by the Tribunal in relation to ss 424A and 425 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth).' "Whether the Tribunal constructively failed to consider the appellant's claims or any integer of his claims." 'Whether the Tribunal erred by rejecting or giving no weight to claimed corroborative evidence after making adverse credibility findings.' 'Whether leave should be granted to raise new grounds on appeal concerning conversion to Christianity, imputed conversion, complementary protection, and continuation of a relationship with a Christian woman.' "Whether the Tribunal's adverse credibility findings were legally unreasonable, illogical or unsupported by contrary evidence."]
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the appellant failed to demonstrate appealable error in the Federal Circuit Court's decision. The Tribunal's adverse credibility findings, including its rejection of the appellant's account of marriage to a Christian woman, conversion to Christianity and harm in Bangladesh, were reasonably open on the material. Those findings permitted the Tribunal to give no weight to the claimed corroborative evidence and meant the factual substratum of the protection and complementary protection claims fell away. The appellant identified no information enlivening s 424A, was afforded a meaningful opportunity under s 425, and the proposed new grounds lacked sufficient...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs payable by the appellant to the first respondent.
Orders
- ['The appeal is dismissed.' "The appellant pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment