AM v Gill [2015] NSWSC 586

AM v Gill [2015] NSWSC 586

No material inaccuracy or omission in the affidavit supporting the application for the surveillance device warrant was established, nor was any dishonesty or fraudulent misrepresentation shown. There is no general duty of disclosure; thus, no basis is established for setting aside the warrant.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
19 May 2015
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Decision on Summons to Set Aside Surveillance Device Warrant
Outcome
Summons dismissed
Legal Topics
['surveillance Device Warrants' 'false or Misleading Affidavit Statements' 'material Omissions' 'duty of Disclosure in Warrant Applications']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Decision on Summons to Set Aside Surveillance Device Warrant

  1. 1 ['Whether false or misleading statements in affidavit supporting application for surveillance device warrant' 'Whether material facts were omitted from affidavit' "Nature and extent of applicant's duty of disclosure in ex parte warrant applications"]

Ratio Decidendi

No material inaccuracy or omission in the affidavit supporting the application for the surveillance device warrant was established, nor was any dishonesty or fraudulent misrepresentation shown. There is no general duty of disclosure; thus, no basis is established for setting aside the warrant.

Court Disposition

Summons dismissed

Orders

  • ['Amended summons dismissed']