AM v Gill [2015] NSWSC 586
No material inaccuracy or omission in the affidavit supporting the application for the surveillance device warrant was established, nor was any dishonesty or fraudulent misrepresentation shown. There is no general duty of disclosure; thus, no basis is established for setting aside the warrant.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 May 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Decision on Summons to Set Aside Surveillance Device Warrant
- Outcome
- Summons dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['surveillance Device Warrants' 'false or Misleading Affidavit Statements' 'material Omissions' 'duty of Disclosure in Warrant Applications']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Decision on Summons to Set Aside Surveillance Device Warrant
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether false or misleading statements in affidavit supporting application for surveillance device warrant' 'Whether material facts were omitted from affidavit' "Nature and extent of applicant's duty of disclosure in ex parte warrant applications"]
Ratio Decidendi
No material inaccuracy or omission in the affidavit supporting the application for the surveillance device warrant was established, nor was any dishonesty or fraudulent misrepresentation shown. There is no general duty of disclosure; thus, no basis is established for setting aside the warrant.
Court Disposition
Summons dismissed
Orders
- ['Amended summons dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment