Lauron v Michael [2021] NSWCATAP 120
The Tribunal's compensation and rent reduction assessment were discretionary determinations not shown to be affected by error or miscarriage of justice; no error of law or relevant fresh evidence warranted leave to appeal; the appellant's challenges concerned matters already considered by the Tribunal, and proper process was followed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 May 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; leave to appeal refused; payment order varied
- Legal Topics
- ['residential Tenancy' 'quiet Enjoyment' 'rent Reduction' 'compensation for Loss or Damage' 'appeal Procedure' 'fresh Evidence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Tribunal erred in its assessment of compensation and rent reduction for breaches of the tenancy agreement' 'Whether the Tribunal failed to consider certain claimed damages and defects' 'Whether fresh evidence should be admitted on appeal' 'Whether leave to appeal should be granted']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal's compensation and rent reduction assessment were discretionary determinations not shown to be affected by error or miscarriage of justice; no error of law or relevant fresh evidence warranted leave to appeal; the appellant's challenges concerned matters already considered by the Tribunal, and proper process was followed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; leave to appeal refused; payment order varied
Orders
- ["Varies the payment order to: 'The total order is that the landlord must immediately pay the tenant the amount of $2,726.76.'" 'Refuses leave to bring the appeal.' 'Appeal otherwise dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment