Aranas v Berry [2002] NSWSC 355

Aranas v Berry [2002] NSWSC 355

The Plaintiff was found to be living in a de facto relationship with the Deceased during the last two years of his life and therefore constitutes an eligible person under the Family Provision Act 1982. Considering her modest circumstances, short duration of the de facto relationship, and the size of the estate, the court ordered provision for the Plaintiff by way of a legacy in the sum of $145,000.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
26 April 2002
Procedural Posture
Family Provision Application / Final Judgment
Outcome
Application allowed in part; order for provision for Plaintiff from estate.
Legal Topics
['de Facto Relationships' 'eligible Person Status' 'provision From Deceased Estate' 'competing Claims on Estate']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Family Provision Application / Final Judgment

  1. 1 ['Whether the Plaintiff was a de facto spouse of the Deceased at the time of his death and therefore an eligible person under the Family Provision Act 1982' "Whether the Plaintiff should receive provision from the Deceased's estate and the nature and amount of such provision"]

Ratio Decidendi

The Plaintiff was found to be living in a de facto relationship with the Deceased during the last two years of his life and therefore constitutes an eligible person under the Family Provision Act 1982. Considering her modest circumstances, short duration of the de facto relationship, and the size of the estate, the court ordered provision for the Plaintiff by way of a legacy in the sum of $145,000.

Court Disposition

Application allowed in part; order for provision for Plaintiff from estate.

Orders

  • ['Plaintiff to receive from the estate of the late Aubrey Thomas Berry a legacy in the sum of $145,000, such legacy not to bear interest if paid on or before 26 July 2002, and if not so paid to bear interest at Supreme Court rates.' 'Costs of the Plaintiff on the party and party basis and costs of the Defendant on...