Deabel v V'Landys [2002] NSWSC 438

Deabel v V'Landys [2002] NSWSC 438

The plaintiff has not made out an arguable case, supported by credible evidence or corroborative materials, for an equitable interest in the defendant's property. The evidence provided was unreliable and unsupported, and mere contributions to household expenses are insufficient to ground an equitable proprietary interest.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
21 May 2002
Procedural Posture
Equity / Final Judgment
Outcome
Summons dismissed
Legal Topics
['caveats' 'equitable Interests' 'constructive Trusts' 'amendment of Caveat']
['real Property' 'equity'] ['caveats' 'equitable Interests' 'constructive Trusts' 'amendment of Caveat']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Equity / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the plaintiff has an arguable case to support an equitable interest in the property to justify maintenance or amendment of a caveat' 'Whether the Court has power to permit amendment of the caveat under relevant statutory and case law']

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff has not made out an arguable case, supported by credible evidence or corroborative materials, for an equitable interest in the defendant's property. The evidence provided was unreliable and unsupported, and mere contributions to household expenses are insufficient to ground an equitable proprietary interest.

Court Disposition

Summons dismissed

Orders

  • ['Summons dismissed' 'Parties to be heard on costs']