Kelly v Carroll [2002] NSWCA 9

Kelly v Carroll [2002] NSWCA 9

The defendant failed to keep a proper lookout and did not reduce speed sufficiently when approaching an intersection where a risk was apparent. Her conduct breached the duty of care and was causative of the accident, agreeing with the trial judge on negligence and apportionment. The plaintiff was also negligent and...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: Amanda Jayne Kelly; Respondent: Melinda Jane Carroll
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
05 February 2002
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; cross-appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Negligence, Contributory Negligence, Causation, Apportionment of Liability, Traffic Accidents, Costs Orders
Tort Law Negligence Contributory Negligence Causation Apportionment of Liability Traffic Accidents Costs Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Amanda Jayne Kelly

Appellant

Melinda Jane Carroll

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant was negligent in driving at the intersection
  2. 2 Whether negligence on the defendant's part caused the accident
  3. 3 The degree of contributory negligence attributable to the plaintiff

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant failed to keep a proper lookout and did not reduce speed sufficiently when approaching an intersection where a risk was apparent. Her conduct breached the duty of care and was causative of the accident, agreeing with the trial judge on negligence and apportionment. The plaintiff was also negligent and her damages were properly reduced by 60%.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; cross-appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed
  • The appellant is to pay the respondent's costs of the appeal