Kay v 3D Design & Build Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCATAP 68
The appeal must be allowed and the orders below quashed as the Tribunal denied the appellant procedural fairness by relying on the Tyrrells Report without allowing the appellant sufficient opportunity to consider and respond, compounded by making a final determination during a directions hearing with no opportunity for submissions, and because the certification requirement set by the Tribunal had not been fully met. These were errors of law warranting remittal of the proceedings for rehearing.
- Parties
- Appellant: Amber Kay; Respondent: 3D Design & Build Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 March 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Internal Appeal / Appeal Determination
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed, decision below quashed, matter remitted for rehearing, monies recovered after lifting of stay to be repaid to appellant
- Legal Topics
- Procedural Fairness, Home Building Dispute, Natural Justice, Tribunal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Amber Kay
Appellant
3D Design & Build Pty Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Internal Appeal / Appeal Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant was denied procedural fairness by not being given an opportunity to respond to disputed evidence (the Tyrrells Report) at the hearing on 15 June 2015
- 2 Whether the Tribunal erred in lifting the stay based on improper or incomplete certification of rectification works
- 3 Whether orders ought be quashed and proceedings remitted due to denial of a reasonable opportunity to be heard
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal must be allowed and the orders below quashed as the Tribunal denied the appellant procedural fairness by relying on the Tyrrells Report without allowing the appellant sufficient opportunity to consider and respond, compounded by making a final determination during a directions hearing with no opportunity for submissions, and because the certification requirement set by the Tribunal had not been fully met. These were errors of law warranting remittal of the proceedings for rehearing.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed, decision below quashed, matter remitted for rehearing, monies recovered after lifting of stay to be repaid to appellant
Orders
- The appeal is allowed.
- The decision made in proceedings HB 14/32008, including the money order made on 30 January 2015, is quashed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment