Winter & 2 Ors v Locker & Anor [2002] NSWSC 1045

Winter & 2 Ors v Locker & Anor [2002] NSWSC 1045

Justice requires the amendment to the name of the second defendant to take effect from the date of the original statement of claim, as the plaintiffs intended to sue the correct entity controlling the hospital and acted promptly to correct the error once discovered. No relevant prejudice was suffered by the defendant, and amendment prior to the expiration of the limitation period is permissible.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
08 November 2002
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application
Outcome
Amendment to name of second defendant takes effect from date of original statement of claim; each party to pay own costs; further application on interrogatories referred for directions
Legal Topics
['amendment of Pleadings' 'effective Date of Amendment' 'damages Assessment' 'supreme Court Rules' 'professional Negligence']
['medical Negligence'] ['amendment of Pleadings' 'effective Date of Amendment' 'damages Assessment' 'supreme Court Rules' 'professional Negligence']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil / Interlocutory Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Should the amendment to the name of the second defendant be treated as taking effect from the date of the original statement of claim or from the later amendment date?' 'Does the timing of the amendment affect the statutory regime applicable to damages assessment under the Health Care Liability Act 2002?']

Ratio Decidendi

Justice requires the amendment to the name of the second defendant to take effect from the date of the original statement of claim, as the plaintiffs intended to sue the correct entity controlling the hospital and acted promptly to correct the error once discovered. No relevant prejudice was suffered by the defendant, and amendment prior to the expiration of the limitation period is permissible.

Court Disposition

Amendment to name of second defendant takes effect from date of original statement of claim; each party to pay own costs; further application on interrogatories referred for directions

Orders

  • ['The amendment to the name of the second defendant is to take effect from the date of filing the statement of claim, namely 12 April 2001.' 'Each party to pay their own costs of the motions.' 'The notice of motion filed 22 August 2002, seeking documents and answers to interrogatories, be referred to the next...