AMIA Investments Pty Ltd ATF MIAA Trust v Georges River Council [2018] NSWLEC 1041
Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, the Court was required to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that agreement and made orders upholding the appeal and approving the development application subject to conditions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 February 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Development Application Appeal / Conciliation Conference; Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; Development Application Number DA2017/0105 approved subject to conditions; applicant ordered to pay respondent's costs thrown away.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between the Parties' 'land and Environment Court Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Development Application Appeal / Conciliation Conference; Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the parties had reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 as to terms of a decision acceptable to them.' 'Whether the agreed decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, the Court was required to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that agreement and made orders upholding the appeal and approving the development application subject to conditions.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; Development Application Number DA2017/0105 approved subject to conditions; applicant ordered to pay respondent's costs thrown away.
Orders
- ['The applicant is granted leave to amend the development application and rely on the plans referred to in Section A, Condition 1. DEV6.1 of Annexure "A" to this agreement. A copy of those plans are Annexure "B" to this agreement.' 'The Appeal is upheld.' 'Development Application Number DA2017/0105 for the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment