Amina Yebdoo v Alan Holmewood [2020] NSWDC 484
The plaintiff failed to discharge the onus of proving, on the balance of probabilities, that the defendant's breach of duty of care was a necessary condition of her harm. The evidence did not establish that timely active braking by the defendant would have avoided the collision or her psychiatric injury. Consequently, judgment must be entered for the defendant.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 August 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the defendant against the plaintiff.
- Legal Topics
- ['motor Vehicle Accident' 'breach of Duty of Care' 'negligence' 'contributory Negligence' 'assessment of Damages' 'civil Liability Act' 'causation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the defendant breached duty of care owed to the plaintiff.' 'Whether the plaintiff breached her duty of care (contributory negligence).' "Whether the defendant's breach of duty was the cause of the plaintiff's harm." 'Assessment of damages in respect of psychiatric injury post-collision.']
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff failed to discharge the onus of proving, on the balance of probabilities, that the defendant's breach of duty of care was a necessary condition of her harm. The evidence did not establish that timely active braking by the defendant would have avoided the collision or her psychiatric injury. Consequently, judgment must be entered for the defendant.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the defendant against the plaintiff.
Orders
- ['Judgment for the defendant against the plaintiff.' "Plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment