Bodenstein v Voukelatos [2010] NSWSC 249
The application for referral for legal assistance must be refused because it was unsupported by any evidence as required under UCPR 7.36.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Amir Bodenstein; First Defendant: Zois Voukelatos; Second Defendant: Vessela Voukelatos
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 March 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Judgment on Application for Pro Bono Referral
- Legal Topics
- Legal Assistance, Pro Bono Referral, UCPR 7.36
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Parties
Amir Bodenstein
Plaintiff
Zois Voukelatos
First Defendant
Vessela Voukelatos
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application / Judgment on Application for Pro Bono Referral
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff should be referred for legal assistance under UCPR 7.36
Ratio Decidendi
The application for referral for legal assistance must be refused because it was unsupported by any evidence as required under UCPR 7.36.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment