AMP Services Ltd v Manning [2006] FCA 256

AMP Services Ltd v Manning [2006] FCA 256

The plaintiff established that Ms Manning, during her notice period, breached her equitable (fiduciary) duty to Arrive by enticing clients to follow her to a competitor, though most would have left with her in any event. No breach of contract (restraint or confidentiality) or statutory duties under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) was established; post-employment restraint was held to either not apply or be void as an unreasonable restraint of trade. There was insufficient evidence against Ms Harkness.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
24 March 2006
Procedural Posture
Employment Contract Dispute / Liability Judgment, Damages Yet to Be Assessed
Outcome
Plaintiffs' claims in contract and statute dismissed; Arrive succeeds in fiduciary duty claim against Ms Manning. Damages to be assessed at later hearing. Claims against Ms Harkness dismissed; costs reserved.
Legal Topics
['restraint of Trade' 'confidentiality' 'fiduciary Duties' 'solicitation of Clients' 'breach of Contract' 'statutory Duties of Company Officers']
['employment Law' 'equity' 'corporations Law'] ['restraint of Trade' 'confidentiality' 'fiduciary Duties' 'solicitation of Clients' 'breach of Contract' 'statutory Duties of Company Officers']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Employment Contract Dispute / Liability Judgment, Damages Yet to Be Assessed

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether defendants breached post-employment restraint and confidentiality clauses' 'Whether defendants breached statutory duties under Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 182, 183' 'Whether defendants breached fiduciary duties to employer and related company' 'Whether losses claimed are attributable to breach of duty' 'Whether post-employment restraint is valid and enforceable']

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff established that Ms Manning, during her notice period, breached her equitable (fiduciary) duty to Arrive by enticing clients to follow her to a competitor, though most would have left with her in any event. No breach of contract (restraint or confidentiality) or statutory duties under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) was established; post-employment restraint was held to either not apply or be void as an unreasonable restraint of trade. There was insufficient evidence against Ms Harkness.

Court Disposition

Plaintiffs' claims in contract and statute dismissed; Arrive succeeds in fiduciary duty claim against Ms Manning. Damages to be assessed at later hearing. Claims against Ms Harkness dismissed; costs reserved.

Orders

  • ["Plaintiffs' claims in contract and statutory duties dismissed" 'Ms Manning found to have breached equitable (fiduciary) duty to Arrive' 'Damages for Arrive to be determined at separate hearing' 'All claims against Ms Harkness dismissed' 'Parties to be heard on costs and final orders']