Sagittarian Enterprises Pty Ltd & Ors v Ampol Ltd [1987] FCA 216

Sagittarian Enterprises Pty Ltd & Ors v Ampol Ltd [1987] FCA 216

There is a triable issue as to whether the principal was undisclosed and, if so, whether the agency relationship permits enforcement of the franchise agreements by the company. Alleged breaches under the Petroleum Retail Marketing Franchise Act and Trade Practices Act cannot be dismissed summarily, as on the material there is a reasonable cause of action and the doctrine of undisclosed principal is not clearly excluded.

Parties
First Applicant: Sagittarian Enterprises Pty Ltd; Second Applicant: Raymond Arthur Woollett; Second Applicant: Kaye Lorraine Woollett; Respondent: Ampol Limited
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
07 May 1987
Procedural Posture
Civil / Motion to Strike Out Proceeding
Outcome
Respondent's motion to dismiss struck out; proceedings continue.
Legal Topics
Petroleum Retail Marketing Franchise Act, Trade Practices Act, Doctrine of Undisclosed Principal, Franchise Agreements, Summary Disposal
Trade Practices Franchising Agency Law Petroleum Retail Marketing Franchise Act Trade Practices Act Doctrine of Undisclosed Principal Franchise Agreements Summary Disposal

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sagittarian Enterprises Pty Ltd

First Applicant

Raymond Arthur Woollett

Second Applicant

Kaye Lorraine Woollett

Second Applicant

Ampol Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil / Motion to Strike Out Proceeding

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the proceedings disclose a reasonable cause of action
  2. 2 Whether the doctrine of undisclosed principal applies to franchise agreements
  3. 3 Whether failure to renew or disclose constitutes breach under Petroleum Retail Marketing Franchise Act

Ratio Decidendi

There is a triable issue as to whether the principal was undisclosed and, if so, whether the agency relationship permits enforcement of the franchise agreements by the company. Alleged breaches under the Petroleum Retail Marketing Franchise Act and Trade Practices Act cannot be dismissed summarily, as on the material there is a reasonable cause of action and the doctrine of undisclosed principal is not clearly excluded.

Court Disposition

Respondent's motion to dismiss struck out; proceedings continue.

Orders

  • The respondent's motion is dismissed.
  • The respondent to pay the applicants' costs of the motion.