AMQ16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 129
None of the applicant's proposed grounds of appeal identify an arguable error on the part of the Federal Circuit Court; the AAT's findings and application of the law were open and reasoned; there is insufficient doubt about the correctness of the FCCA's decision to warrant leave to appeal.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 February 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Determination of Application for Leave to Appeal From Federal Circuit Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['judicial Review' 'leave to Appeal' 'refugee Law' 'credibility Assessment' 'jurisdictional Error' 'procedural Fairness']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Determination of Application for Leave to Appeal From Federal Circuit Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Federal Circuit Court erred in finding no arguable jurisdictional error in the AAT's decision" 'Whether sufficient doubt attends the correctness of the FCCA’s decision to warrant leave to appeal' 'Whether the AAT applied the correct legal tests for persecution and complementary protection' 'Whether procedural fairness was denied by the Tribunal']
Ratio Decidendi
None of the applicant's proposed grounds of appeal identify an arguable error on the part of the Federal Circuit Court; the AAT's findings and application of the law were open and reasoned; there is insufficient doubt about the correctness of the FCCA's decision to warrant leave to appeal.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The application for leave to appeal dated 25 August 2016 is dismissed.' 'The applicant pay the costs of the first respondent, as agreed or assessed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment