Singh v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2023] NSWCATOD 123
The applicant's experience, though spanning 31 sites over 22 months, was largely restricted to early phases of construction, site set up and singular trade work, and did not demonstrate two years' relevant industry experience in a wide range of building construction work as required by s 33D(1)(b) of the Home Building Act 1989 and the instrument. The evidence did not show experience covering all construction stages or varied on-site roles beyond initial construction.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 August 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review / Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Decision under review affirmed
- Legal Topics
- ['home Building Licences' 'experience Requirements' 'administrative Review' 'contractor Licences']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant satisfied the practical experience requirement for an individual contractor licence in general building work' "Interpretation and application of 'wide range of building construction work' under the relevant instrument"]
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant's experience, though spanning 31 sites over 22 months, was largely restricted to early phases of construction, site set up and singular trade work, and did not demonstrate two years' relevant industry experience in a wide range of building construction work as required by s 33D(1)(b) of the Home Building Act 1989 and the instrument. The evidence did not show experience covering all construction stages or varied on-site roles beyond initial construction.
Court Disposition
Decision under review affirmed
Orders
- ['The decision under review is affirmed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment