Anabelle Bits Pty Ltd v Fujitsu Ltd (No. 3) [2009] FCA 1089

Anabelle Bits Pty Ltd v Fujitsu Ltd (No. 3) [2009] FCA 1089

The applicant, Anabelle Bits Pty Ltd, has demonstrated a prima facie case for the relief claimed against the first respondent, Fujitsu Ltd, including under the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) and Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW), sufficient to justify service of the application outside Australia. This is established through evidence that promotional materials provided by Fujitsu Ltd were distributed in Australia, that representations about product reliability allegedly occurred in Australia, and that such conduct may be attributed to Fujitsu Ltd notwithstanding its distribution arrangements. A prima facie case is not required for each cause or item of relief, but only for one; accordingly, the...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
25 September 2009
Procedural Posture
Motion / Interlocutory (notice of Motion to Set Aside Service, Rehearing of Application for Leave to Serve Originating Process Outside Australia)
Outcome
Motion dismissed; applicant entitled to costs of the motion.
Legal Topics
['service Outside Jurisdiction' 'prima Facie Case for Relief' 'misleading or Deceptive Conduct' 'negligent Misstatement' 'jurisdiction of Federal Court' 'agency in Distribution' 'application of Trade Practices Act and Fair Trading Act' 'common Law Duty of Care']
['practice and Procedure' 'trade Practices' 'torts'] ['service Outside Jurisdiction' 'prima Facie Case for Relief' 'misleading or Deceptive Conduct' 'negligent Misstatement' 'jurisdiction of Federal Court' 'agency in Distribution' 'application of Trade Practices Act and Fair Trading Act' 'common Law Duty of Care']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Motion / Interlocutory (notice of Motion to Set Aside Service, Rehearing of Application for Leave to Serve Originating Process Outside Australia)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the applicant has a prima facie case for the relief claimed against the first respondent to justify service outside Australia' 'Whether relief claimed under the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) and Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) can be pursued against a foreign respondent' 'Whether misleading or deceptive conduct alleged against Fujitsu Limited occurred in Australia' "Whether the actions of Fujitsu Australia Limited are attributable to Fujitsu Limited under agency or 'on behalf of' principles"]

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant, Anabelle Bits Pty Ltd, has demonstrated a prima facie case for the relief claimed against the first respondent, Fujitsu Ltd, including under the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) and Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW), sufficient to justify service of the application outside Australia. This is established through evidence that promotional materials provided by Fujitsu Ltd were distributed in Australia, that representations about product reliability allegedly occurred in Australia, and that such conduct may be attributed to Fujitsu Ltd notwithstanding its distribution arrangements. A prima facie case is not required for each cause or item of relief, but only for one; accordingly, the...

Court Disposition

Motion dismissed; applicant entitled to costs of the motion.

Orders

  • ["The first respondent's Notice of Motion filed 30 June 2009, seeking orders under Order 9 rule 7(1) of the Federal Court Rules, is dismissed." "The first respondent is to pay the applicant's costs of the motion."]