Manolakis v Carter [2009] FCA 483

Manolakis v Carter [2009] FCA 483

The proceeding was dismissed as an abuse of process because it was substantially a re-litigation of matters already determined in previous proceedings between the parties, involved serious unparticularised allegations unsupported by evidence, and amounted to unjustifiable oppression of the respondent, potentially bringing the administration of justice into disrepute.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
15 May 2009
Procedural Posture
Originating Application / Judgment Following Interlocutory Application by Respondent to Dismiss or Stay Proceeding
Outcome
The proceeding is dismissed as an abuse of process. The applicant is ordered to pay the respondent's costs on an indemnity basis.
Legal Topics
['abuse of Process' 'vexatious Proceedings' "liquidators' Duties" 'costs']
['civil Procedure'] ['abuse of Process' 'vexatious Proceedings' "liquidators' Duties" 'costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Originating Application / Judgment Following Interlocutory Application by Respondent to Dismiss or Stay Proceeding

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the proceeding is an abuse of process or vexatious under Order 20 Rule 5 of the Federal Court Rules' 'Whether the orders sought by the applicant have already been litigated in prior proceedings']

Ratio Decidendi

The proceeding was dismissed as an abuse of process because it was substantially a re-litigation of matters already determined in previous proceedings between the parties, involved serious unparticularised allegations unsupported by evidence, and amounted to unjustifiable oppression of the respondent, potentially bringing the administration of justice into disrepute.

Court Disposition

The proceeding is dismissed as an abuse of process. The applicant is ordered to pay the respondent's costs on an indemnity basis.

Orders

  • ['The proceeding be dismissed.' 'The applicant pay the respondent his costs of the proceeding on an indemnity basis.']