Donnelly & Anor v Ross Mining & Ors [2001] NSWCA 229
The undertakings in this Court do not reflect such success in the proceedings as would entitle the claimants to an order for costs; interlocutory undertakings were interim accommodations and not substantive relief.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 June 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Dismissal of Motion for Costs
- Outcome
- Motion of 11 May 2000 is dismissed with costs; no order as to other costs of the proceedings in the Court of Appeal.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'interlocutory Relief' 'development Consent' 'protection of Aboriginal Relics']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Dismissal of Motion for Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Entitlement to costs in the Court of Appeal' 'Breach of Environmental Planning and Assessment Act' 'Work outside designated development consent area']
Ratio Decidendi
The undertakings in this Court do not reflect such success in the proceedings as would entitle the claimants to an order for costs; interlocutory undertakings were interim accommodations and not substantive relief.
Court Disposition
Motion of 11 May 2000 is dismissed with costs; no order as to other costs of the proceedings in the Court of Appeal.
Orders
- ['Motion 11/5/00 dismissed with costs' 'No order as to other costs of the proceedings in the Court of Appeal']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment