Nadinic v Drinkwater (No 2) [2017] NSWCA 334

Nadinic v Drinkwater (No 2) [2017] NSWCA 334

No reason has been shown to displace the usual order as to costs; Mr Nadinic must pay Ms Drinkwater's costs of the application for a stay of execution.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
18 December 2017
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Costs Determination Following Abandonment of Application for Stay of Execution
Outcome
Costs awarded to respondent
Legal Topics
['costs' 'stay of Execution']
['civil Procedure'] ['costs' 'stay of Execution']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Costs Determination Following Abandonment of Application for Stay of Execution

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether costs should follow the event after abandonment of application for stay' 'Whether any reason exists to displace the usual order as to costs']

Ratio Decidendi

No reason has been shown to displace the usual order as to costs; Mr Nadinic must pay Ms Drinkwater's costs of the application for a stay of execution.

Court Disposition

Costs awarded to respondent

Orders

  • ["Mr Nadinic to pay Ms Drinkwater's costs of the application for a stay of execution"]