Gee v Valuer General [2011] NSWLEC 1160

Gee v Valuer General [2011] NSWLEC 1160

The applicant did not discharge the burden of proof to show that the land value assessed by the Valuer General was incorrect. The valuation method and adjustments made by the respondent were preferred, and the evidence did not support a lower land value for the subject property.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
30 June 2011
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['land Valuation' "appeal From Valuer General's Land Value Assessment"]
['real Property'] ['land Valuation' "appeal From Valuer General's Land Value Assessment"]

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the land value assessed by the Valuer General was excessive' 'Whether the applicant discharged the onus of proof to warrant a different land value']

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant did not discharge the burden of proof to show that the land value assessed by the Valuer General was incorrect. The valuation method and adjustments made by the respondent were preferred, and the evidence did not support a lower land value for the subject property.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['The appeal is dismissed.' 'The exhibits are returned except for exhibits 1 and A.']