Iskandar v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 494
There are no grounds made out within section 476(1) of the Migration Act by which the Federal Court could interfere with the decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal; the application must therefore be dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 April 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'judicial Review']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Federal Court can interfere with the Refugee Review Tribunal’s decision under section 476(1) of the Migration Act 1958']
Ratio Decidendi
There are no grounds made out within section 476(1) of the Migration Act by which the Federal Court could interfere with the decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal; the application must therefore be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['The application be dismissed.' "The applicant pay the respondent's costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment